April 11, 2006

Learning 2.0: The aggregator as the new desktop

Filed under: BlogBridge, Product Features — Pito Salas on 10:08 pm

Kathleen Gilroy of the Otter Group writes about Learning 2.0. In the first part she describes how our new world of communications, social networking, blogging, tagging and so on are fundamentally transforming how people learn and teach. This is what she calls “Learning 2.0.“:

Rather than working alone inside of centralized applications users now access distributed web services that allows them to do things collaboratively. These services include social bookmarking services like del.icio.us, which allows users to independently upload and tag URLs to a server where they can be accessed and shared; and web software services like Basecamp where projects are managed using a web service as opposed to an application on the PC. Web services are easily interconnected through open standards and open application interfaces (APIs).

Plugged together, these services can replace more rigid centralized applications and put their power in the hands of the users. (fromLearning 2.0 Basics“)

In part two, especially interesting for us at BlogBridge, Kathleen puts forward world in which the aggregator  becomes the new desktop. Here the role of RSS and aggregators in Web 2.0 is explored further:

“RSS provides an essential framework that organizes Web content into clean, crisp chunks (known as items) that have vital metadata associated with them, like the date of publication, authorship, categories and tags. RSS is increasingly becoming the “language” of Intranet 2.0.” (fromLearning 2.0 Basics, Part 2“)

A couple of interesting bits about that quote. First, note the term “Intranet 2.0″. Everyone, almost, who thinks and writes about Web 2.0 is thinking about the public internet. Kathleen posits, and I agree, that equally interesting changes are happening inside the firewall.

In fact, we at BlogBridge will soon be describing a new product that we are releasing which we are calling, for now, BlogBridge: Library. It’s not quite in stealth, but on the other hand we aren’t being especially loud about it yet, because it’s not ready yet. But soon!

200604021053-Tm

The second interesting bit is the screenshot you see to the left. Clearly it’s a picture of the BlogBridge screen. But I am struck by how Kathleen labels the left column “Reading Lists.”

If you know BlogBridge terminology you know that we’ve called those Guides. But I have to admit that the term Guide is problematic. Many people say, “Why don’t you just call them ‘Folders’? After all that’s really what they are?” And yes, this is true to some extent.

Ok I admit it, I find the term Folder just boring, and Guides more evocative. But it’s a term that’s unique in BlogBridge. The term Reading List though has currency far beyond BlogBridge. And it’s a damn good description of what those Guides are.

Ok, first of all a prize if you are still reading :) But to you BlogBridge users, a question: what would you think if we renamed Guides to be “Reading Lists”? There’s a nice consistency with the rest of the product and how else we use the term. And we’d be rid of “Guides”. What say you?

Technorati Tags:

  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Furl

6 Comments »

  1. I don’t mind whether they’re called Guides or Reading Lists in BlogBridge, but as you say — they’ll add a lot of visibility to the support for OPML reading lists in the product. I say do it!

    Comment by Kevin Yank — April 12, 2006 @ 2:21 am

  2. Guide or Reading Lists? Reading Lists!

    Pito Salas asks whether the "Guides" in Blogbridge (my favorite RSS aggregator) should be renamed to "Reading Lists". From my point of view the concept of "Reading Lists" is much more focused than "Guides", beca

    Trackback by Lars Trieloff's Software Documentation Weblog — April 12, 2006 @ 6:28 am

  3. Better than ‘Guides’. But then what do you call the OPML Reading Lists?

    Comment by Don — April 12, 2006 @ 2:37 pm

  4. Reading Lists is definitely better than Guides, and replacing BlogBridge-only vocabulary with emerging standards is good progress. OPML is then the import/export format for reading lists. Nice.

    Comment by glenn mcdonald — April 12, 2006 @ 7:35 pm

  5. Reading Lists is a great change!

    Comment by JerryOL — April 21, 2006 @ 12:32 pm

  6. My vote goes to “reading lists” or simply “lists”.

    Comment by Dan — April 30, 2006 @ 1:59 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress